VIGIL v. VIGIL

No. 18763.

338 P.2d 688 (1959)

Mary VIGIL, Plaintiff In Error, v. Joe VIGIL, a.k.a. A. J. A. Vigil, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

May 4, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George G. Ross, Denver, for plaintiff in error.

Bannister, Weller & Friedrich, John R. Hickisch, William H. Hazlitt, Denver, for defendant in error.


DAY, Justice.

Plaintiff in error was plaintiff in the trial court and will be referred to as Mary. Defendant in error will be referred to as Joe.

This case originated when Mary sued Joe for divorce in 1955 in the county court of the City and County of Denver, alleging that nine and one-half years previously, in 1946, she and Joe had entered into a common-law marriage. The complaint prayed for dissolution of the alleged marriage, alimony, support for a child...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases