CITY OF SCHENECTADY v. LAURICELLA


9 A.D.2d 996 (1959)

City of Schenectady, Respondent, v. Carmen Lauricella et al., Appellants City of Schenectady, Respondent, v. Rocco Errichetto (Arket) et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

December 31, 1959


Appellants' contention that the determination was not that of all or a majority of the commissioners (Condemnation Law, § 14) is not substantiated in any respect by the record, which is, in fact, directly to the contrary, or by the circumstance that, according to the report, the chairman expended additional time "in further detailed examination of the record and preparing [the] Report." Appellants contend, also, that the report should show "how much was allowed for each...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases