The validity of the second felony sentence inflicted on defendant, is made the object of legal attack in this motion.
Put forth as the controversial argument in support of this move, is the alleged impropriety of using a prior judgment of conviction of a sister State for the groundwork of the multiple sentence, here, when, according to defendant's contention, it did not measure up to the specification required by section 1941...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
