JAROS v. FLOERSHEIMER


5 A.D.2d 986 (1958)

John Jaros, Appellant-Respondent, v. Walter D. Floersheimer et al., Defendants; Sutro Bros. & Co., Respondent, and Merkin & Co. et al., Respondents-Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 29, 1958


The complaint as to defendant Sutro Bros. & Co., was dismissed pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that the Statute of Frauds barred the causes of action alleged therein. While on the record before Special Term that disposition was warranted, leave should nevertheless be granted to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint — if plaintiff is so advised and if the facts support it — to allege causes of action which may withstand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases