COX v. SINCLAIR


139 A.2d 835 (1958)

Douglas S. COX et al. v. Herschel E. SINCLAIR.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

March 17, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald E. Rudman, Bangor, for plaintiffs.

Dubord & Dubord, Waterville, for defendant.

Before WILLIAMSON, C. J., and WEBBER, BELIVEAU, TAPLEY, and SULLIVAN, JJ.


BELIVEAU, Justice.

On exception and motion for new trial. At the close of the evidence the defendant moved for a directed verdict, which motion was denied and exception taken. After verdict for the plaintiffs the defendant filed the usual motion for a new trial.

The parties agree that the exception and motion raise the same question, and, for that reason, will not be discussed separately in this opinion.

On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases