Judgment affirmed, with costs.
All concur, except Williams and Halpern, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial, in the following memorandum:
The trial court's analysis of the case and of the legal theories applicable thereto was erroneous. There was no de facto taking of the claimant's milk plant. The principal question was one of consequential damages, alleged to have been caused by interference with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.