BAUMBACH v. DICKENS

19899.

213 Ga. 745 (1958)

101 S.E.2d 702

BAUMBACH v. DICKENS et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided January 10, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grady L. Randolph, Joseph B. Kilbride, for plaintiff in error.

Norman H. Fudge, contra.


ALMAND, Justice.

The judgment under review is one denying a motion for a new trial in a proceeding to probate in solemn form the alleged will of Helen Dickens, wherein the jury returned a verdict in favor of the caveators and a judgment was entered denying probate.

1. The sole ground of the caveat filed by the heirs of Helen Dickens was that she did not sign or execute the document propounded as her will, and that which purports to be her signature on the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases