1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 262 F.2d
  5. 262 F.2d 689 (1958)
 

GREENSBORO-HIGH POINT AIRPORT AUTHORITY v. C. A. B.

No. 14382.

262 F.2d 689 (1958)

GREENSBORO-HIGH POINT AIRPORT AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, City of Charlotte, North Carolina, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Piedmont Aviation, Inc., Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided November 26, 1958.

Petition for Rehearing Denied December 17, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Albert F. Beitel, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Mr. Morris Chertkov, Attorney, Civil Aeronautics Board, with whom Messrs. Franklin M. Stone, General Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, John H. Wanner, Associate General Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, O. D. Ozment, Asst. General Counsel, Litigation and Research, Civil Aeronautics Board, Monte Lazarus, Attorney, Civil Aeronautics Board, and Daniel M. Friedman, Attorney, Department of Justice, were on the brief, for respondent.

Messrs. James M. Verner and James F. Neal, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for intervenor City of Charlotte, North Carolina.

Messrs. E. Smythe Gambrell and Harold L. Russell, Atlanta, Ga., were on the brief for intervenor Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

Messrs. Cecil A. Beasley, Jr., and R. J. Shortlidge, Jr., Washington, D. C., entered appearances for intervenor Piedmont Aviation, Inc.

Before WASHINGTON, BASTIAN and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Civil Aeronautics Board entered after the Board had completed proceedings undertaken as a result of our order of remand in Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1956, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 358, 231 F.2d 517. In that case we stated that —

"Greensboro has not received a plain answer to its charge of discrimination. * * * The issue was flatly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases