Defendant attacks the conviction on a number of grounds. (1) On the trial, a chemist testified that analysis of a sample of defendant's blood revealed the presence of 0.18% ethyl alcohol and a physician testified that such an alcoholic level "signifies a definite impairment of ability" to operate an automobile. It developed on the trial that neither witness testified before the Grand Jury and defendant contends that there was, on that account, insufficient evidence before...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
