Per Curiam.
The respondent, an attorney admitted to practice in this State in April, 1951, was charged with professional misconduct in two respects. The first, that in disregard and disrespect for the law and its process, he ignored 54 traffic tickets; the second, that he failed to supply his client, upon demand, with a written accounting of the disposition of moneys the respondent held in escrow for the purpose of paying the claims of all creditors, and failed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
