The respondent warden considered that past correspondence, ostensibly between appellant and the children, was a means taken by their mother and appellant to communicate with each other and to evade institutional regulations. The warden notified petitioner "that he will be permitted to receive greeting cards or notes from the children obviously in their own handwriting, but that he will not be permitted to receive letters signed with their names by their mother, or to send...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
