ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. RISS & COMPANY

No. 14562.

267 F.2d 657 (1958)

ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. RISS & COMPANY, Inc., Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Order On Motion for Clarification December 16, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Francis M. Shea, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Lawrence J. Latto and Richard T. Conway, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for petitioner Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co. and certain other petitioners, argued for all petitioners. Mr. Henry L. Walker, Washington, D. C., was also on the brief for Southern Ry. Co. and certain other petitioners. Messrs. Hugh B. Cox and James H. McGlothlin, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for The Baltimore & O. R. R. Co. and certain other petitioners. Messrs. Stuart S. Ball, Richard J. Flynn and Joseph D. Feeney, Jr., Chicago, Ill., were on the brief for petitioner Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. and certain other petitioners. Messrs. H. Graham Morison and Newell A. Clapp, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for petitioner Louisville & N. R. R. Co. Messrs. John D. Lane and Fred S. Gilbert, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief for petitioners Boston & M. R. R. and The New York, N. H. & H. R. R. Co. Mr. Martin A. Meyer, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief for petitioner Virginian Ry. Co. Mr. Edward K. Wheeler, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for petitioners The Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. and New York Cent. R. R. Co.

Mr. Robert L. Wright, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. A. Alvis Layne, Jr., and Lester M. Bridgeman, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for respondent.

Messrs. David I. Shapiro and Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Washington, D. C., entered appearances for Aircoach Transport Ass'n, Inc., as amicus curiae.

Before BAZELON, BASTIAN and BURGER, Circuit Judges.


Order on Petition for Writ of Certiorari to United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Order On Petitioners' Motion for Clarification December 16, 1958.

PER CURIAM.

This case came on for consideration on the order of the District Court entered May 26, 1958, denying petitioners' motion to suspend proceedings pending a determination by the Interstate Commerce Commission of whether prior Commission-Approved agreements are applicable to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases