Appellant contests the findings of accident and of causal relationship. The board found that while claimant was working with an acetylene torch, sparks entered his eye, causing a very slight burn and abrasions, which gave rise to infection and ulceration eventually necessitating removal of the eye. Claimant testified that sparks flew into his face and some of them got under his safety goggles where they did not fit tightly and into his eye; that he felt something hot hit...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
