Per Curiam.
The ruling of the Trial Judge excluding testimony sought to be introduced by the attorney for the tenant as to conversations with landlord leading up to the execution of the lease in respect of the number of rooms and services required, presents prejudicial error. Tenant should have been permitted to prove his affirmative defenses and counterclaims, particularly when they were interposed under allegations charging
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.