SZARF v. BLUMENFELD


5 A.D.2d 887 (1958)

Jurek Szarf, Individually and as Administrator of The Estate of Mieczyslaw Szarf, Deceased, Appellant, v. Berek Blumenfeld, Respondent. (Appeal No. 3.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 24, 1958


Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without prejudice to a renewal of the motion upon a proper proposed amended answer.

The present proposed amended answer is improper in that it pleads the legal effect of foreign statutes rather than their substance. It is also necessary to plead that the foreign statutes were in effect at the time of the alleged transaction, and to negative any exceptions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases