Per Curiam.
The attempt by plaintiff to establish that defendant had allegedly defrauded a purchaser [of an automobile] other than the plaintiff and the testimony and colloquy that ensued with respect thereto, as well as other gratuitous remarks by the court concerning the alleged reason for objections by defendant's counsel, constitute prejudicial error.
In addition, defendant was entitled to an unequivocal charge that absent one of the elements of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
