1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 162 F.Supp.
  5. 162 F.Supp. 661 (1958)
 

RUSCHMANN v. UNITED STATES

Civ. A. 1010-56.

162 F.Supp. 661 (1958)

Henry RUSCHMANN and Bertha Ruschmann, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

May 29, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Druse, Plainfield, N. J., for plaintiffs.

Chester A. Weidenburner, U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., and Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., by James P. Garland, and Jerome S. Hertz, Washington, D. C., for the government.

WORTENDYKE, District Judge.

In this case plaintiff Henry Ruschmann was an equal partner with Henry Goetz in the firm of Goetz and Ruschmann (G & R) and claimed as a deduction from gross income for the taxable year 1952 one-half of the $5,000. paid by that firm to Franz Mueller und Sohn (Mueller), of Bielefeld, Germany. The facts in this case, therefore, are in all respects similar with those in Goetz v. United States, D.C., 162 F.Supp. 657

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases