1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 159 F.Supp.
  5. 159 F.Supp. 661 (1958)
 

SUN RUBBER COMPANY v. NATIONAL LATEX PRODUCTS CO.

Civ. Nos. 31211, 31212.

159 F.Supp. 661 (1958)

The SUN RUBBER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL LATEX PRODUCTS COMPANY, Harry R. Gill, Sr., and Harry R. Gill, Jr., Defendants. The SUN RUBBER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. The AKRON PRESFORM MOLD COMPANY and Theodore A. Miller, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

January 29, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. L. Ely, Bernard C. Frye, Akron, Ohio, for Sun Rubber Co.

Evans & McCoy, Cleveland, Ohio, for National Latex Products Co.

A. H. Oldham, Vern L. Oldham, Akron, Ohio, for Akron Presform Mold Co.

JONES, Chief Judge.

By consent of the parties, these two cases were consolidated for trial for the reason that they each involve the validity and infringement of the same patents. The patents are related to each other, each by reference in the patent, as are the parties related contractually.

One of the patents, Molitor No. 2,629,134 provides for a process or method for making hollow plastic articles. The other, Martin, et al., No. 2,629,131 discloses a machine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases