COCKMAN v. POWERS

No. 521.

103 S.E.2d 710 (1958)

248 N.C. 403

Idell H. COCKMAN v. Curtis E. POWERS.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 21, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hammond & Walker, Asheboro, for plaintiff-appellant.

Moser & Moser, Asheboro, and Vaughn, Hudson, Ferrell & Carter, by Ralph M. Stockton, Jr., Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellee.


BOBBITT, Justice.

Plaintiff's testimony is the only evidence as to the cause and circumstances of her injuries. Since the only question is the sufficiency of plaintiff's evidence to survive defendant's motion for judgment of nonsuit, a close examination of plaintiff's testimony is required. Her testimony, summarized in part and quoted in part, is set out below.

Plaintiff lived with her husband, Clarence Cockman, and their 10 and 1 year old sons, some three...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases