Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The questions of fact have been considered and a new trial would not be granted on those questions.
In our opinion, it was prejudicial error to exclude the proffered testimony of appellant's expert concerning the customary use of a chain when moving logs with tractor-shovels (Garthe v. Ruppert, 264 N.Y. 290, 296; Regan v. Eight Twenty Fifth Corp., 287 N.Y. 179; Lerner v. Sears...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.