OKLAHOMA TIRE & SUPPLY COMPANY v. ROLAND

No. 37629.

331 P.2d 474 (1958)

The OKLAHOMA TIRE & SUPPLY COMPANY, a Corporation, and Grady Chronister, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Sadie ROLAND, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

October 14, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D.F. Rainey and John Barksdale, Okmulgee, for plaintiffs in error.

Bailey & Pitchford, by J.I. Pitchford, II, Okmulgee, for defendant in error.


WELCH, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs in error argue the case under four propositions: The first proposition urged is that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the fellow servant doctrine and in giving the following instruction, to-wit:

"You are instructed that an agent is a person who is appointed by another to do some work, or conduct some transaction for another. When such agent is acting under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases