1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 101 S.E.2d
  5. 101 S.E.2d 696 (1958)
 

BARBOUR v. GOODMAN

No. 451.

101 S.E.2d 696 (1958)

247 N.C. 655

James R. BARBOUR, Jr., a Citizen and Taxpayer, for and on Behalf of Richmond County, v. Raymond W. GOODMAN, Sheriff of Richmond County, and Raymond W. Goodman, Individually.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 31, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jones & Jones, Rockingham, for plaintiff-appellant.

Pittman, Webb & Lee, Rockingham, and Fletcher & Lake, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.

JOHNSON, Justice.

A careful study of the plaintiff's exceptions and supporting arguments discloses neither prejudicial nor reversible error. For the reasons stated in the foregoing conclusions of Judge Preyer, who heard the case below, we think the judgment should be upheld. 20 C.J.S. Counties § 101, p. 898, note 83; 14 Am.Jur., Counties, Sec. 32. See also Suttle v. Doggett, 87 N.C. 203. As to the services performed by the County Auditor and Tax Supervisor, it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases