1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 163 Cal.App.2d
  5. 163 Cal.App.2d 633 (1958)
 

VAN BUSKIRK v. McCLENAHAN

Docket No. 17760.

163 Cal.App.2d 633 (1958)

329 P.2d 924

E.W. VAN BUSKIRK et al., Appellants, v. WILLIAM F. McCLENAHAN et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

September 19, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Foley & Foley and James W. Foley for Appellants.

Mullin & Cost and Hugh F. Mullin, Jr., for Respondents.

ST. CLAIR, J. pro tem.*

Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting defendant's motion for a nonsuit. In granting the motion, the trial court said: "It is the opinion of the Court that there was no diligence shown in this case in the sale of this house. The plaintiffs being in the building business and knowing the market value, and, in fact, the market rising rather than dropping, the Court feels that the defendants in this case didn't have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases