1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 162 Cal.App.2d
  5. 162 Cal.App.2d 625 (1958)
 

LINCOLN v. DIDAK

Docket No. 22792.

162 Cal.App.2d 625 (1958)

328 P.2d 498

A. LINCOLN, Appellant, v. E. DIDAK et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

August 6, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Lincoln, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney (Los Angeles), William B. Burge, Deputy City Attorney, Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel (Los Angeles), and Lloyd S. Davis, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

Plaintiff, who is also known as John G. Oppenheimer, appeals from orders dismissing his complaint against various named defendants, being the City Attorney of the City of Los Angeles, three of his deputies, the Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles, a member of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles and the Clerk of the Municipal Court of Los Angeles Judicial District.

The complaint which was directed not only against the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases