ZOOMAR, INC. v. PAILLARD PRODUCTS

No. 346, Docket 24741.

258 F.2d 527 (1958)

ZOOMAR, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAILLARD PRODUCTS, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided August 18, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis H. Shereff, of Shereff Brothers, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Harry Cohen, of Levisohn, Niner & Cohen, New York City (Edwin Levisohn, of Levisohn, Niner & Cohen, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and HINCKS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.


CLARK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, assignee of patents Nos. 2,454,686 and 2,718,817 involving varifocal lenses for moving picture and television cameras, appeals from an adverse judgment in an action for patent infringement. The court below held plaintiff's patents invalid for want of invention, insufficient disclosure, and excessively broad claims, and alternatively held that defendant's device did not infringe these patents. This involved all the claims of the first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases