MEINHARDT v. BRITTING


10 Misc.2d 757 (1958)

Harold S. Meinhardt, Plaintiff, v. John A. Britting et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Suffolk County.

January 7, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oscar Murov for John A. Britting and another, defendants.

Maloney & Doyle for Albert Glass and another, defendants.

Jack Stanislaw for plaintiff.


D. ORMONDE RITCHIE, J.

The defendants John A. Britting and Edna Britting make a motion pursuant to section 241 of the Civil Practice Act for an order striking the complaint as violative of the direction therein that every pleading shall contain a plain and concise statement of the material facts without unnecessary repetition and evidentiary matter; or, in the alternative, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases