CROSLAND-CULLEN COMPANY v. CROSLAND

No. 248.

105 S.E.2d 655 (1958)

249 N.C. 167

CROSLAND-CULLEN COMPANY, a corporation, v. Matilda H. CROSLAND.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 19, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carswell & Justice, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant.

William H. Abernethy, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee.


RODMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff's cause of action is based on the assertion that defendant, by virtue of a void assignment, has received from insurer monies which should have been paid to plaintiff, the beneficiary in the policy of insurance.

Defendant admits receipt of the money pursuant to the provisions of the assignment. She affirmatively asserts that plaintiff's right to question the validity of this assignment has been foreclosed by a decree of a court of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases