1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 167 F.Supp.
  5. 167 F.Supp. 590 (1958)
 

LIND v. SCHENLEY INDUSTRIES, INC.

Civ. A. No. 439-57.

167 F.Supp. 590 (1958)

Dan LIND, Plaintiff, v. SCHENLEY INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

November 7, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving J. Soloway, by Bernard I. Kramer and Ronald C. Targan, Newark, N. J., for plaintiff.

Milton, McNulty & Augelli, by John Milton, Jr., and John J. Hanlon, Jr., Jersey City, N. J., and Milton B. Seasonwein, New York City, for defendant.

WORTENDYKE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Lind had a verdict molded by the Court upon special findings made by the jury, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 49, 28 U.S.C. Motion for direction of verdict for defendant was denied. Motion is now made for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. F.R.C. P. 50. Both motions must be considered. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Duncan, 1940, 311 U.S. 243

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases