MORGAN v. ONASSIS


5 N.Y.2d 732 (1958)

Hugh Morgan, Jr., et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Duer, Strong & Whitehead, Respondents, v. Aristotle S. Onassis, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 25, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis X. Nestor for appellant.

Emerson F. Davis and Charles R. Van de Walle for respondents.

Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE concur.


Per Curiam.

The recovery in this action is not based on any contract between plaintiffs and defendant-appellant, Onassis, nor any situation analogous to that presented in Flamm v. Noble (296 N.Y. 262). Plaintiffs' cause of action is based on a lien for professional services rendered not to Onassis but to their own client, which has been held to cover settlement funds in the hands of Onassis. Plaintiffs' client...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases