MANZON v. GREENWALD

No. 2210.

145 A.2d 575 (1958)

Frank M. MANZON and Rose Manzon, Appellants, v. W. R. GREENWALD, Appellee.

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided November 12, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herman Miller, Washington, D. C., for appellants.

John T. Reges, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.


HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellee, as indorsee of a promissory note sued appellants, the makers. The trial court found appellee to be a holder in due course and awarded judgment in his favor.

Appellants contend that the finding that appellee was a holder in due course was in error because the note was not complete and regular on its face.1 The claim of incompleteness is based on the fact...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases