1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 159 Cal.App.2d
  5. 159 Cal.App.2d 549 (1958)
 

BERRY v. CHROME CRANKSHAFT CO.

Docket No. 23031.

159 Cal.App.2d 549 (1958)

324 P.2d 70

ERNEST V. BERRY, Appellant, v. CHROME CRANKSHAFT COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

April 18, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Babcock and Gene W. Arant for Appellant.

Benjamin J. Goodman and Lyon & Lyon for Respondents.

ASHBURN, J.

Plaintiff sued Chrome Crankshaft Company and others for an injunction against the use of plaintiff's trade secrets and secret processes, and for damages for wrongful use of same in the past. Though at issue the cause has not been tried. In conjunction with Benjamin J. Goodman, Esq., the firm of Lyon & Lyon, Los Angeles patent attorneys, has appeared for defendant Chrome Crankshaft Company. During the taking of the deposition of Lile W. Harvey, one...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases