1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 214 Or.
  5. 214 Or. 490 (1958)
 

RUTH ET UX v. HICKMAN

214 Or. 490 (1958)

330 P.2d 722

RUTH ET UX v. HICKMAN

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed as modified October 22, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry G. Spencer, Salem, and Edward A. Butler, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Harris, Butler & Husk and Vernon D. Gleaves, Eugene, and Harry G. Spencer, Salem.

J.M. Copenhaver, Redmond, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Cunning & Brewster, Bend, and Thomas Boeke, and J.J. Thalhofer, Redmond.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK and McALLISTER, Justices.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

McALLISTER, J.

1. This is a suit in equity brought by the plaintiffs, Adrian Ruth and Mildred Ruth, his wife, to rescind a contract entered into by them for the purchase of a general insurance agency from the defendant, C. Von Hickman. From a decree in favor of plaintiffs, the defendant has appealed.

The contract involved in this suit was executed on March 31, 1954. For a number of years...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases