Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Appellant attacked a 1928 judgment convicting him, on his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree on the ground that, when he appeared for judgment, he was not asked whether he had legal cause to show why judgment should not be pronounced against him (Code Crim. Pro., § 480). The documentary evidence submitted on the return of the writ, together with the presumption of regularity, shows that the question was asked...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
