ANDERSON v. HULL

[No. 109, September Term, 1957.]

215 Md. 476 (1958)

138 A.2d 875

ANDERSON ET UX. v. HULL ET UX.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 25, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elmer O. Anderson, pro se, for the appellants.

D. Eugene Walsh, with whom were Charles O. Fisher and Walsh & Fisher on the brief, for the appellees.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.


BRUNE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case comes to us in a thoroughly confused state, due in no small measure, we believe, to the fact that the appellants (defendants in the trial court) have undertaken to represent themselves in this litigation.

The appellants make two contentions in their brief: one that they were denied due process of law in contravention of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; the other, that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases