1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 217 Md.
  5. 217 Md. 458 (1958)
 

JEWELER v. POTOMAC ELEC. POW. CO.

[No. 285, September Term, 1957.]

217 Md. 458 (1958)

144 A.2d 66

JEWELER ET UX. v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 2, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert M. Brune, and R. Edwin Brown, with whom was John E. Oxley on the brief, for the appellants.

Richard W. Emory, with whom were William J. McCarthy, James H. Pugh and Venable, Baetjer & Howard on the brief, for the appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

HAMMOND, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal from a judgment on a jury's inquisition in a condemnation case was argued with that in Potomac Electric Power Company v. Birkett, 217 Md. 476, recently decided, and presents different aspects of some of the points there decided. Appellants in this case argue that the Potomac Electric Power Company (Pepco) did not establish proof...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases