This appeal relates (1) to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a judgment for plaintiff for commissions alleged to be due by defendant to plaintiff; (2) to the refusal of the trial judge to charge the jury with respect to a fraud alleged to have been committed by plaintiff in computing his commission; (3) to the failure of the trial judge to inform counsel of the receipt
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HYMAN REIVER AND COMPANY v. ROSE
147 A.2d 500 (1958)
HYMAN REIVER AND COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellant, v. Richard V. ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Delaware.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 23, 1958.
December 23, 1958.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Irving Morris and H. B. Rubenstein (of Cohen & Morris), Wilmington, for appellant.
Robert V. Huber, Wilmington, for appellee.
SOUTHERLAND, C. J., and WOLCOTT and BRAMHALL, JJ., sitting.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
