1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 2 Wis.2d
  5. 2 Wis.2d 635 (1958)
 

GLADFELTER v. DOEMEL

2 Wis.2d 635 (1958)

GLADFELTER, Respondent, vs. DOEMEL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 7, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Jansen & Wallace of Oshkosh, and Lehner & Lehner of Princeton, and oral argument by Philip Lehner, Sr.

For the respondent there was a brief by Henry P. Hughes of Oshkosh, attorney, and Herbert S. Humke of Sheboygan of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Humke.

CURRIE, J.

The defendant advances the following contentions on this appeal:

(1) That he made a full and fair disclosure of all the facts within his knowledge to the district attorney and signed the criminal complaint against the plaintiff in reliance upon the advice of such district attorney, thereby establishing probable cause as a matter of law.

(2) That the defendant had probable cause to believe the plaintiff guilty as a matter of law.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases