1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 213 Or.
  5. 213 Or. 422 (1958)
 

TOOMEY v. MOORE ET UX

213 Or. 422 (1958)

325 P.2d 805

TOOMEY v. MOORE ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed as modified May 21, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Floyd D. Hamilton, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Theodore Opsund and Ray G. Brown, Portland.

Samuel B. Weinstein, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Floyd D. Moore, Portland.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, BRAND and McALLISTER, Justices.

DECREE MODIFIED.

McALLISTER, J.

This suit was instituted by Hans O. Sater, as guardian of the person and estate of Hulda Hollander, an incompetent, against Floyd D. and Marion C. Moore, husband and wife, to recover from said defendants certain property transferred to them by said incompetent including her home, household furnishings and effects and bank account.

The trial court entered a decree giving plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases