REGENSTREIF v. POLARIZED LIGHTING


10 Misc.2d 612 (1958)

Nat Regenstreif et al., Individually and as Stockholders of Polarized Lighting Inc., Suing on Behalf of Themselves and for the Benefit of the Corporation and All Other Stockholders Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Polarized Lighting Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special and Trial Term, New York County.

February 25, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan H. Elman for plaintiffs.

Robert E. Nickerson for defendants.


FREDERICK BACKER, J.

The following additional findings of fact and conclusions of law are made supplementing those submitted by the plaintiffs and defendants and which have been passed upon simultaneously herewith.

1. That in addition to those findings approved and made in the finding submitted by the parties respecting their oral understanding and agreement as of April 6, 1956, the court further finds that plaintiff Nat Regenstreif agreed either...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases