1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 158 Cal.App.2d
  5. 158 Cal.App.2d 460 (1958)
 

REINFELD v. S.F. CITY AND CTY. EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Docket No. 17765.

158 Cal.App.2d 460 (1958)

322 P.2d 508

RUBY B. REINFELD, Individually and as Special Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. THE SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

March 18, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and Norman Sanford Wolff, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellants.

James C. Purcell and Michael Riordan for Respondent.

BRAZIL, J. pro tem.*

For 40 years or so, Harry Reinfeld was a civil service employee of the city and county of San Francisco, serving in the capacity of an engineer. As such employee he was a member of long standing in the city's retirement system and he had made regular contributions to the retirement fund in a total sum, with interest, of $9,554.73.

In November of 1953 the retirement board notified him that as he would be 65...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases