Of the ballots objected to, Special Term found 324 valid for appellant, 633 valid for respondent, 96 void and 191 blank. This resulted in a majority of 36 ballots in respondent's favor. In this court appellant challenged 227 ballots; 7 of these were marked for appellant with improper cross marks and Special Term correctly held them blank for the office in question; 220 were marked for respondent and counted for him by Special Term. We have examined these ballots and affirm...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.