PANDOLFO v. ANSBRO


10 Misc.2d 51 (1958)

Nicholas Pandolfo, Plaintiff, v. F. Paul Ansbro et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as F. Paul Ansbro, M. D., F. A. C. A. Associates in Anesthesiology, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

February 26, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin, Clearwater & Bell for defendants.

Scotto & Mangano for plaintiff.


EDWARD G. BAKER, J.

Motion by defendant, Sweeney, under subdivision 5 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint as to him individually, upon the ground that the cause of action therein alleged did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of the action.

Said defendant is one of three physicians who are named as defendants in the action (for alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases