COMMONWEALTH v. MUTH


188 Pa.Super. 401 (1958)

Commonwealth v. Muth, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

December 17, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Beyer, with him Arnold, Bricker, Beyer & Barnes, for appellant.

Richard M. Martin, Assistant District Attorney, with him William C. Storb, District Attorney, for appellee.

Before RHODES, P.J., HIRT, GUNTHER, WRIGHT, ERVIN, and WATKINS, JJ. (WOODSIDE, J., absent).


OPINION BY ERVIN, J., December 17, 1958:

In this case it was stipulated by counsel that the testimony would be the same as in the case of Commonwealth v. Weik, 188 Pa.Super. 391, 147 A.2d 164, "except as to weights." In the present case the evidence showed that the overweight was 5,010 pounds.

The decision in this case is controlled by the opinion filed herewith in Commonwealth v. Weik, supra.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases