1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 3 Wis.2d
  5. 3 Wis.2d 585 (1958)
 

NOTHEM v. BERENSCHOT

3 Wis.2d 585 (1958)

NOTHEM, Plaintiff, vs. BERENSCHOT and others, Defendants. [Two appeals.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 8, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff there was a brief and oral argument by Thomas M. Corrigan, attorney, and Morris Karon of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the defendants Orlon W. Berenschot and the State Farm Mutual Insurance Company there were briefs by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and John R. Henderson of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Henderson.

For the defendant James Schmechel there was a brief and oral argument by Emmet McCarthy of Marinette.

WINGERT, J.

Berenschot appealed from the entire judgment, including that part dismissing his cross complaint against Schmechel for contribution. Schmechel does not contend that the bill of exceptions was not timely served on him. The controversy between Berenschot and Schmechel as to the former's right to have contribution from Schmechel is therefore before us on the merits, and to dispose of it we must consider the bill...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases