1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 50 Cal.2d
  5. 50 Cal.2d 512 (1958)
 

COML. COMMUNICATIONS v. PUBLIC UTIL. COM.

Docket Nos. S.F. 19722, 19723, 19725.

50 Cal.2d 512 (1958)

327 P.2d 513

COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (a Corporation) et al., Petitioners, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent; PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY (a Corporation), Real Party in Interest. WATSON COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. (a Corporation) et al., Petitioners, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent; PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY (a Corporation), Real Party in Interest. THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent; PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY (a Corporation), Real Party in Interest.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

June 27, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McClean, Salisbury, Petty & McClean, Robert S. McClean, John E. Scheifly, Edward M. Berol, Bruce R. Geernaert, Berol & Silver, Robert N. Lowry, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, Gerald H. Trautman, Brent M. Abel, Thomas B. McGuire, McCutchen, Thomas, Matthew, Griffiths & Greene, Jerome Preston, Jr., Lawrence A. Sullivan, Foley, Hoag & Eliot, Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney (Los Angeles), and Alan G. Campbell, Assistant City Attorney, for Petitioners.

Joseph E. Keller, Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, John E. Scheifly, McClean, Salisbury, Petty & McClean, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, Robert N. Lowry, Francis L. Cross and Cross & Brandt as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.

Everett C. McKeage, Roderick B. Cassidy, Hugh N. Orr, Boris H. Lakusta and H.J. McCarthy for Respondent.

Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Arthur T. George, Eugene M. Prince, Francis N. Marshall, Dudley A. Zinke and G.H. Eckhardt, Jr., for Real Party in Interest.

SHENK, J.

This is a consolidated proceeding to review an order of the Public Utilities Commission accepting, with modifications and directions, tariff schedule Number 108-T filed by Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, hereinafter called Pacific. The schedule was voluntarily filed and covered the installing, leasing and maintaining of private mobile communications systems. The tariff was originally accepted to become...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases