In this personal injury negligence action there is a dispute between incoming and outgoing attorneys on the determination of the lien of the outgoing lawyers under the provisions of the Judiciary Law. The incoming attorneys insist that the fee of the outgoing lawyers be determined on a fixed dollar amount quantum meruit. The outgoing attorneys, on the other hand, assert their right to receive a contingent percentage
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
REUBENBAUM v. B. & H. EXPRESS
6 A.D.2d 47 (1958)
Samuel Reubenbaum, Respondent, v. B. & H. Express, Inc., et al., Defendants. Eugene L. Sugarman et al., Copartners Practicing Law under the Name of Sugarman, Kuttner & Fuss, Appellants; Glicker & Doynow, Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 27, 1958.
May 27, 1958.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Eugene L. Sugarman of counsel, in person (Sugarman, Kuttner & Fuss, attorneys), for Eugene L. Sugarman and others, appellants.
BOTEIN, P. J., FRANK, McNALLY and STEVENS, JJ., concur.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
