KONRAD v. STATE


4 Wis.2d 532 (1958)

KONRAD and wife, Respondents, vs. THE STATE and/or WISCONSIN CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 26, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by the Attorney General and Roy G. Tulane, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Tulane.

For the respondents there was a brief by Douglas, Omernik & Bitney of Spooner, and oral argument by E. E. Omernik.


BROWN, J.

An inverse condemnation proceeding under ch. 32, Stats., is conducted at the expense of the taker. Sec. 32.15 (1), Stats. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to their expenses as well as their taxable costs. The expenses are substantial, particularly in view of their contract to pay a contingent fee to their attorneys. While the judgment does not expressly state that ch. 32, Stats., does not afford a remedy to plaintiffs for a taking of their property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases