SPRINGER v. KOROTKI

[No. 110, September Term, 1957.]

215 Md. 310 (1958)

137 A.2d 655

SPRINGER ET UX. v. KOROTKI ET UX.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 20, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard H. Lerch for the appellants.

Arnold Fleischmann, with whom were Abraham Levin, H. Richard Smalkin, A. Frederick Taylor and Smalkin, Hessian, Martin & Taylor on the brief, for the appellees.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.


HAMMOND, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Springer bought a neighborhood grocery business from his friend, Korotki, and after continuing it for over a year, discovered to his own satisfaction that, in inducing the sale, Korotki, by word and deed, had misrepresented the weekly dollar volume of the store's sales. He promptly filed a bill for rescission. The chancellor decided that the testimony Springer produced was not definite, clear and convincing enough to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases