1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 254 F.2d
  5. 254 F.2d 268 (1958)
 

LITTLE MULE CORPORATION v. THE LUG ALL COMPANY

No. 16447.

254 F.2d 268 (1958)

LITTLE MULE CORPORATION, Aluminum Products, Inc., and William E. Housel, Appellants, v. THE LUG ALL COMPANY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hal H. McCaghren, West Palm Beach, Fla., Charles J. Merriam and Merriam, Lorch & Smith, Chicago, Ill., George H. Lorch, Samuel B. Smith, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for appellants.

Stanley B. Richard, Miami Beach, Fla., Harry Langsam and Stanley Bilker, Philadelphia, Pa., Howard Richard, Upper Darby, Pa., of counsel, for appellee.

Before RIVES, TUTTLE and CAMERON, Circuit Judges.

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

Involved in this suit are two lightweight, highly efficient, hand-operated winches which have been designed to enable an operator to lower loads under positive control. The Lug All Company manufactures its device under the Wallace Patent No. 2,633,328, dated March 31, 1953. It instituted the suit for infringement in the district court. The accused device is manufactured by appellants under authority of the Du Bois Patent No. 2,738,954, dated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases