1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 53 N.J.
  5. 53 N.J. Super. 455 (1958)
 

CERMAK v. HERTZ CORP.

53 N.J. Super. 455 (1958)

147 A.2d 800

PAUL CERMAK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANT AND AETNA METALCRAFT, INC., ETC., AND OLINTO J. DIGEORGE, JOINTLY, ETC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Reargued June 16, 1958.

Decided July 8, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sylvester S. Garfield and Mr. Philip L. Nadler argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Victor P. Mullica, on the brief; Mr. Pasquale Pipi and Messrs. Gross & Garfield, attorneys).

Mr. Roger F. Lancaster argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Mr. Howard T. Rosen on the brief; Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos, attorneys).

Before Judges PRICE, HANEMAN and SCHETTINO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.A.D.

This is a negligence action arising out of an automobile accident. The case was tried in the district court after having been transferred there from the county court. The cause of action as against defendant Hertz was dismissed by consent of the parties. The jury returned a verdict in the sum of $15,000 against defendants-appellants and, following a motion by defendants for a new trial, the trial court reduced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases